RAS BiologyПрикладная биохимия и микробиология Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0555-1099
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-574X

Method for Analyzing the Antimicrobial Activity of Peptides via Escherichia coli Expression System

PII
S0555109925010038-1
DOI
10.31857/S0555109925010038
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 61 / Issue number 1
Pages
25-34
Abstract
The test system for an assay of new potential antimicrobial peptides (AMP) based on the expression of recombinant AMP-encoding genes in Escherichia coli cells has been proposed. This method has a number of advantages over the use of chemically synthesized peptides and both approaches effectively complement each other. Our approach does not impose limitations on the AMP size, facilitates high-throughput screening of mutant plasmid libraries, and has lower cost and complexity compared to the use of synthetic peptides. The core of our methodology involves transformation of the model gram-negative bacterium E. coli with plasmids carrying a recombinant AMP-encoding gene regulated by an inducible promoter. Following transcription induction, bacteria synthesize the AMP, which ultimately leads to cell death. The assessment of bacterial growth is carried out either by measuring the optical density of a bacterial culture grown in liquid media in a microplate or by drip seeding of serial culture dilutions on an agar-based nutrient medium.
Keywords
антимикробные пептиды Escherichia coli тест-система плазмиды
Date of publication
12.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
17

References

  1. 1. Muteeb G., Rehman M.T., Shahwan M., Aatif M. // Pharmaceuticals. 2023. V. 16. № 11. P. 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111615
  2. 2. Salam Md.A., Al-Amin Md.Y., Salam M.T., Pawar J.S., Akhter N., Rabaan A.A., Alqumber M.A.A. // Healthcare. 2023. V. 11. № 13. P. 1946. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131946
  3. 3. Mba I.E., Nweze E.I. // Yale J. Biol. Med. 2022. V. 95. № 4. P. 445–463.
  4. 4. Moretta A., Scieuzo C., Petrone A.M., Salvia R., Manniello M.D., Franco A. et al. // Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021. V. 11. P. 668632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.668632
  5. 5. Browne K., Chakraborty S., Chen R., Willcox M.D., Black D.S., Walsh W.R., Kumar N. // IJMS. 2020. V. 21. № 19. P. 7047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197047
  6. 6. Kumar P., Kizhakkedathu J., Straus S. // Biomolecules. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom8010004
  7. 7. Huan Y., Kong Q., Mou H., Yi H. // Front. Microbiol. 2020. V. 11. P. 582779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.582779
  8. 8. Galzitskaya O.V. // IJMS. 2023. V. 24. № 11. P. 9451. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119451
  9. 9. Agüero-Chapin G., Antunes A., Marrero-Ponce Y. // Antibiotics. 2023. V. 12. № 6. P. 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061011
  10. 10. Yan J., Cai J., Zhang B., Wang Y., Wong D.F., Siu S.W.I. // Antibiotics. 2022. V. 11. № 10. P. 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101451
  11. 11. Bakare O.O., Gokul A., Niekerk L.-A., Aina O., Abiona A., Barker A.M., et al. // IJMS. 2023. V. 24. № 14. P. 11864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411864
  12. 12. Bin Hafeez A., Jiang X., Bergen P.J., Zhu Y. // IJMS. 2021. V. 22. № 21. P. 11691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111691
  13. 13. Dini I., De Biasi M.-G., Mancusi A. // Antibiotics. 2022. V. 11. № 11. P. 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111483
  14. 14. Cardoso M.H., Orozco R.Q., Rezende S.B., Rodrigues G., Oshiro K.G.N., Cândido E.S., Franco O.L. // Front. Microbiol. 2020. V. 10. P. 3097. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03097
  15. 15. Yoshida M., Hinkley T., Tsuda S., Abul-Haija Y.M., McBurney R.T., Kulikov V. et al. // Chem. 2018. V. 4. № 3. P. 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.01.005
  16. 16. Aronica P.G.A., Reid L.M., Desai N., Li J., Fox S.J., Yadahalli S. et al. // J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021. V. 61. № 7. P. 3172–3196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00175
  17. 17. Merrifield R.B., Stewart J.Morrow., Jernberg Nils. // Anal. Chem. 1966. V. 38. № 13. P. 1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50155a057
  18. 18. Bello-Madruga R., Torrent Burgas M. // Comput. Struct. Biotechnol.J. 2024. V. 23. P. 972–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.008
  19. 19. Zhang H.-Q., Sun C., Xu N., Liu W. // Front. Immunol. 2024. V. 15. P. 1326033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1326033
  20. 20. Steiner H., Hultmark D., Engström Å., Bennich H., Boman H.G. // Nature. 1981. V. 292. № 5820. P. 246–248. https://doi.org/10.1038/292246a0
  21. 21. Casteels P., Ampe C., Jacobs F., Vaeck M., Tempst P. // The EMBO Journal. 1989. V. 8. № 8. P. 2387–2391. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08368.x
  22. 22. Grafskaia E.N., Pavlova E.R., Latsis I.A., Malakhova M.V., Ivchenkov D.V., Bashkirov P.V., et al. // Materials & Design. 2022. V. 224. P. 111364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111364
  23. 23. Klock H.E., Lesley S.A. High Throughput Protein Expression and Purification. / Ed. S.A. Doyle. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2009. V. 498. P. 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-196-3_6
  24. 24. Wiegand I., Hilpert K., Hancock R.E.W. // Nat. Protoc. 2008. V. 3. № 2. P. 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.521
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library