Везде

RAS BiologyПрикладная биохимия и микробиология Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0555-1099
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-574X

Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Stabilized by Lipopeptides and Glycolipids Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Pseudomonas fluorescens

You can
PII
S3034574XS0555109925030058-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034574X25030058
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A.G. Khina
  • Affiliation:
    Lomonosov Moscow State University
    Bauman Moscow State Technical University
A.S. Gordeev
  • Affiliation: Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management
L.R. Biktasheva
  • Affiliation: Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management
D.M. Gorbunov
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
P.A. Kuryntseva
  • Affiliation: Kazan Federal University, Institute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management
G.V. Lisichkin
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
A.D. Izarova
  • Affiliation:
    Lomonosov Moscow State University
    National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"
Volume/ Edition
Volume 61 / Issue number 3
Pages
269-282
Abstract
The colloidal chemical and antibacterial properties of aqueous dispersions of silver nanoparticles stabilized by surfactin and rhamnolipids isolated from B. amyloliquefaciens and P. fluorescens were studied. The isolated biosurfactants were identified by thin layer chromatography and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Using the methods of UV-visible spectrophotometry, transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering, the colloidal chemical characteristics of the resulting dispersions were studied. Optimal ratios of the precursor substances were found in which the used biosurfactants perform as effective stabilizers of dispersions of silver nanoparticles and ensure their aggregative stability for at least two months. It was shown that the studied dispersions have antibacterial activity against gram-positive B. subtilis and gram-negative P. aeruginosa and E. coli. A comparative assessment of the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles stabilized by biosurfactants and traditional silver-containing preparations, such as a silver nitrate solution and a dispersion of silver nanoparticles stabilized by citrate, was carried out. Furthermore, dispersions stabilized with surfactin showed the highest antibacterial activity, comparable to the effect of a silver nitrate solution, which is associated with their good colloidal stability. In addition, high antibacterial activity of dispersions of silver nanoparticles stabilized with biosurfactants isolated from Bacillus and Pseudomonas bacteria against strains of the other genus was discovered. An explanation of the observed phenomenon is given and the prospects for its application in medicine are proposed.
Keywords
наночастицы серебра биосурфактанты липопептиды гликолипиды сурфактин рамполипид антибактериальное действие минимальная ингибирующая концентрация
Date of publication
10.01.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
25

References

  1. 1. Varela M.F., Stephen J., Lekshmi M., Ojha M., Wenzec N., Sanford L.M., Hernandez A.J. et al. // Antibiotics. 2021. V. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050593
  2. 2. Butler M.S., Gigante V., Sati H., Paulin S., Al-Sulaiman L., Rex J.H. et al. // Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022. V. 66. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01991-21
  3. 3. Stachelek M., Zalewska M., Kawecka-Grochocka E., Sakowski T., Bagnicka E. // Annals of Animal Science. 2021. V. 21. P. 63–87. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0098
  4. 4. Vila J., Moreno-Morales J., Ballesté-Delpierre C. // Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020. V. 26. P. 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.015
  5. 5. Hamad A., Khashan K.S., Hadi A. // J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020. V. 30. P. 4811–4828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01744-x
  6. 6. Waszczyskowska A., Żyro D., Ochocki J., Jurowski P. // Biomedicines. 2021. V. 9. P. 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020210
  7. 7. Sekito T., Sadahira T., Watanabe T., Maruyama Y., Watanabe T., Iwata T. et al. // World Acad. Sci J. 2022. V. 4. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasi.2022.141
  8. 8. Ozdal M., Gurkok S. // ADMET DMPK. 2022. V. 10. P. 115–129. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.1172
  9. 9. Krutyakov Y., Klimov A., Violin B., Kazmin V., Ryzhikh V., Gusev A. et al. // Eur. J. Nanomed. 2016. V. 8. P. 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/ejnm-2016-0018
  10. 10. Yin I.X., Zhang J., Zhao I.S., Mei M.L., Li Q., Chu C.H. // Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2020. V. 15. P. 2555–2562. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S246764
  11. 11. Dos Santos C.A., Seckler M.M., Ingle A.P., Gupta I., Galdiero S., Galdiero M. et al. // J. Pharm. Sci. 2014. V. 103. P. 1931–1944. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24001
  12. 12. Cambier S., Rogeberg M., Georgantropoulou A., Serchi T., Karlsson C., Verhaegen S. et al. // Sci. Total Environ. 2018. V. 610. P. 972–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.115
  13. 13. Abramenko N., Semenova M., Khina A., Zherebin P., Krutyakov Y., Krysanov E., Kustov L. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224003
  14. 14. Khina A.G., Krutyakov Y.A. // Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2021. V. 57. P. 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683821060053
  15. 15. Salleh A., Naomi R., Utami N.D., Mohammad A.W., Mahmoudi E., Mustafa N., Fauzi M.B. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081566
  16. 16. Liau S.Y., Read D.C., Pugh W.J., Furr J.R., Russell A.D. // Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997. V. 25. P. 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00219.x
  17. 17. Gordon O., Vig Slenters T., Brunetto P.S., Villaruz A.E., Sturdevant D.E., Otto M. et al. // Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010. V. 54. P. 4208–4218. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01830-09
  18. 18. Dibrov P., Dzioba J., Gasink K.K., Häse C.C. // Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002. V. 46. P. 2668–2670. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.46.8.2668–2670.2002
  19. 19. Yamanaka M., Hara K., Kudo J. // Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005. V. 71. P. 7589–7593. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7589-7593.2005
  20. 20. Freeland J., Khadka P., Wang Y. // Phys. Rev. E. 2018. V. 98. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.062403
  21. 21. Adeyemi O.S., Shitu E.O., Akpor O.B., Rotimi D., Batiha G.E. // EXCLI J. 2020. V. 19. P. 492. http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2020-1244
  22. 22. Cabiscol Català E., Tamarit Sumalla J., Ros Salvador J. // Int. Microbiol. 2000. V. 3. № 1. P. 3–8. https://doi.org/10.2436/IM.V311.9235
  23. 23. McQuillan J.S., Shaw A.M. // Nanotoxicology. 2014. V. 8. P. 177–184. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.870243
  24. 24. Krutyakov Y.A., Khina A.G. // Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2022. V. 58. P. 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683822050106
  25. 25. Krutyakov Y.A., Kudrinsky A.A., Olenin A.Y., Lisichkin G.V. // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2008. V. 77. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2008007n03ABH003751
  26. 26. Kvitek L., Pandéek A., Soukupová J., Koldř M., Večebová R., Prucek R. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008. V. 112. P. 5825–5834. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp711616v
  27. 27. Gibata A., Želisewska P., Gosiewski T., Krawczyk A., Duraczyńska D., Szaleniec J. et al. // Biomolecules. 2021. V. 11. P. 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101481
  28. 28. Vertelov G.K., Krutyakov Y.A., Efremenkova O. V., Olenin A.Y., Lisichkin G.V. // Nanotechnology. 2008. V. 19. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/35/355707
  29. 29. Markande A.R., Patel D., Varjani S.A. // Bioresour. Technol. 2021. V. 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124963
  30. 30. Payol McKenna P., Naughton P.J., Dooley J.S.G., Ternan N.G., Lemoine P., Banat I.M. // Pharmaceuticals. 2024. V. 17. P. 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/phl7010138
  31. 31. Chrzanowski L., Ławniczak L., Czaczyk K. // World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012. V. 28. P. 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0854-8
  32. 32. André S., Meyer T., Rigolei A., Prigent-Combaret C., Höfte M., Ballaux G. et al. // Microbiol. Spectr. 2021. V. 9. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02038-21
  33. 33. Kumar C.G., Mamidvala S.K., Das B., Sridhar B., Devi G.S., Karuna M.S. // J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010. V. 20. P. 1061–1068. http://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1001.01018
  34. 34. Salazar-Bryam A.M., Yoshimura I., Santos L.P., Moura C.C., Santos C.C., Silva V.L., et al. // Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces. 2021. V. 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111883
  35. 35. Reddy A.S., Chen C. Y., Baker S.C., Chen C. C., Jean J. S., Fan C. W. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2009. V. 63. P. 1227–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.028
  36. 36. Rangarajan V., Dhamarajan G., Dey P., Chattopadhya D., Sen R. // Appl. Nanosci. 2018. V. 8. P. 1809–1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0852-3
  37. 37. Bezza F.A., Tichapondwa S.M., Chirwa E.M.N. // J. Hazard Mater. 2020. V. 393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122319
  38. 38. Joanna C., Marcin L., Ewa K., Grazyna P. A // Ecotoxicology. 2018. V. 27. P. 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1899-3
  39. 39. Elnosary M., Aboehmagd H., Sofy M.R., Sofy A. // Egypt J. Chem. 2023. V. 66. P. 209–223. http://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.159976.6894
  40. 40. Vasileva-Tonkova E., Soitrova A., Galabova D. // Curr. Microbiol. 2011. V. 62. P. 427–433. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9725-z
  41. 41. EL-Amine Bendaha M., Mebrek S., Naimi M., Tijrit A., Belaouni H.A. // Open Access Sci. Rep. 2012. V. 2. http://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.544
  42. 42. Schalchli H., Lamilla C., Rubilar O., Briceno G., Gallardo F., Durán N. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023. V. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.111572
  43. 43. Zhang F., Huo K., Song X., Quan Y., Wang S., Zhang Z. et al. // Microb. Cell Fact. 2020. V. 19. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01485-z
  44. 44. Sarker S.D., Nahar L., Kumarasamy Y. // Methods. 2007. V. 42. № 4. P. 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vmeith.2007.01.006
  45. 45. Volk H., Hendry P. Consequences of Microbial Interactions with Hydrocarbons, Oils, and Lipids: Production of Fuels and Chemicals. / Ed. S. Y. Lee. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31421-1_202-1
  46. 46. Gordadze G.N., Tikhomirov V.I. // Pet. Chem. 2007. V. 47. № 6. P. 389–398.
  47. 47. Seo J., Hoffmann W., Warnke S., Huang X., Gewinner S., Schöllkopf W. et al. // Nat. Chem. 2017. V. 9. P. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2615
  48. 48. Janek T., Gudiña E.J., Potomska X., Biniax P., Jama D., Rodrigues L.R. et al. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123488
  49. 49. Deepika K.V., Raghuram M., Branthachari P.V. // Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2017. V. 11. P. 218–231. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7881
  50. 50. Nayartseeri A., Singh P., Singh S.K. // Bioinformation. 2018. V. 14. № 6. P. 304–314. http://doi.org/10.6026/97320630014304
  51. 51. Shah M.U.H., Sivapragasam M., Moniruzzamana M., Yusup S.B. // Procedia Engineering. 2016. V. 148. P. 494–500. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.538
  52. 52. Dengle-Pulate V., Chandorkar P., Bhagwat S., Prabhune A.A. // J. Surfactants Deterg. 2014. V. 17. P. 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-013-1495-8
  53. 53. Oluwaseun A.C., Kola O.J., Mishra P., Singh J.R., Singh A.K., Cameotra S.S., Micheal B.O. // Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2017. V. 6. P. 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2017.07.001
  54. 54. Huynh K.A., Chen K.L. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011. V. 45. P. 5564–5571. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200157h
  55. 55. Lyng M., Kovacs A.T. // Trends Microbiol. 2023. V. 31. P. 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2023.02.003
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library